This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

16 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for global cardiovascular disease, responsible for an estimated 10.8 million deaths and more than 200 million disability-adjusted life years annually.1 Despite the availability of effective pharmacological and lifestyle interventions, prevalence continues to rise, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over three-quarters of all cases now occur.2 The condition’s […]

33/First UK experience of cardiac contractility modulation therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

R Dulai (Presenting Author) - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne; S Badiani - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne; RA Veasey - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne; S Furniss - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne; N Patel - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne; N Sulke - East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne
2 mins
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Sep 27th 2010 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2020;6(Suppl. 1):abstr33
Select a Section…
1

Article

Background: Cardiac Contractility Modulation therapy is a novel device-based technology, which may be used in selected heart failure patients. CCM therapy involves applying biphasic, high-voltage (≈7.5 V) and long-duration (≈20 milliseconds) electric signals to the right ventricular septal wall during the absolute myocardial refractory period, which invokes biochemical and cellular changes in the failing myocardium thus improving contractility. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes in the first ten patients implanted with a CCM device in the United Kingdom.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. 10 patients who met the inclusion criteria (EF 25-45%, NYHA class 3 or 4 and QRS duration less than 130 ms) were implanted with a CCM device in 2018. As part of their follow-up they underwent regular review by the heart failure team. We report the changes in ejection fraction, NYHA class and The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) scores over the follow-up period.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.3 ± 7.8. Six of the patients were male and the majority of patients (90 %) had an ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The average follow-up in months was 21.30 ± 2.2. Overall, the ejection fraction improved from 26.2% ± 4.4% to 31.8% ± 3.6% at final follow-up (p=0.40) and quality of life as measured by the MLHFQ improved significantly from 56.3 ± 19.6 to 34.0 ± 21.8 (p≤0.01). (Figure 1) All patients improved at least one NYHA class. Overall, the NYHA class improved from 2.80 ± 0.92 to 1.7 ± 0.68 (p=0.77).

Conclusion: CCM therapy resulted in an improvement in ejection fraction and quality of life in this patient cohort, which is consistent with previous clinical trial data. CCM therapy provides a potential new treatment option for these patients who would not be eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup