Trending Topic

3 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

It is with pride and gratitude that we reflect on the remarkable 10-year journey of European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. With the vital contributions of all of our esteemed authors, reviewers and editorial board members, the journal has served as a platform for groundbreaking research, clinical insights and news that have helped shape the […]

< 1 min

Differential effects of adrenergic antagonists (Carvedilol vs Metoprolol) on parasympathetic and sympathetic activity: a comparison of measures

Aaron I. Vinik, Heather L. Bloom, Joe Colombo
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Aug 10th 2018 Heart International 2014;9(1):7-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/HEART.2014.12495
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Background. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is recognized as a significant health risk. Specific and
sensitive measures of CAN are needed for early identification and treatment to avoid complications, preferably
in the preclinical state.
Objectives. In this first of two articles, the patient cohort is described and two measures of autonomic function
are reviewed: the traditional heart rate variability (HRV)-alone method and the newer parasympathetic and sympathetic
(P&S) Method. These systems are then evaluated against known effects of the alpha/beta-adrenergic
blocker, Carvedilol, and the selective beta-adrenergic blocker, Metoprolol, on P&S activity.
Methods. Serial autonomic nervous system test data from 147 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients from eight ambulatory
clinics were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to whether a beta-blocker was (1) introduced,
(2) discontinued or (3) continued without adjustment. Group 3 served as the control. HRV-alone parameters are
computed according to standards. The P&S Method, which is a time–frequency analyses of concurrent respiratory
activity and HRV, is elucidated, as developed at MIT and Harvard Medical School (1981).
Results. The HRV-alone demonstrated that introducing either medication increased low frequency (msec2) and
standard deviation of the beat-to-beat (N-N) interval (msec), as expected. The other HRV parameter responses
were not consistent with expectations. Similar inconsistencies occurred when either medication was discontinued.
The P&S Method demonstrated that introducing or discontinuing either agent decreased or increased
sympathetic activity, respectively, according to expectations. With ongoing treatment, resting parasympathetic
activity decreased with Metoprolol but increased with Carvedilol.
Conclusion. Autonomic assessment fidelity was significantly higher with the P&S Method as validated by comparison
with previously known physiology of the cardiovascular system.

Keywords

Beta-blocker, Cardiac autonomic neuropathy, Heart rate variability, Patient outcomes, Respiratory analysis, Sympathovagal imbalance

2

Article Information

Disclosure

Financial support: None.

Correspondence

Dr. Joe Colombo 240 South Eighth Street Philadelphia, PA, USA 19107 joe@ans-hrv.com

3

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup