Trending Topic

15 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in adults worldwide.1 Coronary angiography (CAG) is the gold standard method for evaluating atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD).2 It is conventionally performed via the trans-femoral (TF) route. Recently, however, the trans-radial (TR) route has become the preferred way.3 The TR route offers better procedure comfort, shorter hospitalization […]

< 1 min

55/Prognosis of incidental left bundle branch block

A Zegard (Presenting Author) – Aston University, Birmingham, UK; O Okafor – Aston University, Birmingham, UK; J DeBono – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; R Steeds – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; L Hudsmith – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; B Stegemann – Medtronic Inc, Maastricht, The Netherlands; A Jani – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; H Marshall – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; B Holloway – Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Qiu – Aston University, Birmingham, UK; F Leyva – Aston University, Birmingham, UK
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Oct 4th 2008 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2019;5(Suppl. 1):abstr55
Select a Section…
1

Article

Background: Incidental LBBB (iLBBB) is a frequent cause for cardiology referrals. In such instances, there may be uncertainty as to its prognosis and need for clinical follow-up. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard for myocardial phenotyping.

Objectives: To determine the utility of CMR in the risk stratification of patients with iLBBB.

Methods: CMR was used to identify the myocardial phenotype of patients with iLBBB. We compared outcomes of patients with an iLBBB with (iLBBBCMR+) or without (iLBBBCMR–) an abnormal CMR scan with healthy controls as well as age- and sex-matched individuals in the general population (life tables).

Results: In patients with iLBBB (n=199, aged 62.9 ± 12.6 years (mean ± SD), CMR was abnormal in 136 (68.4%) and was attributed to ischaemic (30 [15.1%]), non-ischaemic (94 [47.2%]) causes, hypertension (24 [12.1%]) and aortic valve disease (7 [3.5%]). Over 4 (2.5–5.3) years (median [interquartile range]), iLBBBCMR+ had a higher risk of total mortality or major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 8.48, 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 2.56–28.1, p<0.001), total mortality (aHR: 4.96, 95% C.I. 1.44–17.1, p=0.011) and total mortality or heart failure hospitalisation (aHR: 7.75, 95% C.I. 2.31–26.0, p=0.001) compared with controls. iLBBBCMR- had a similar risk of all endpoints. iLBBBCMR- patients had a similar survival to controls and the general population.

Conclusions: Over two thirds of patients with a iLBBB had an abnormal myocardial phenotype on CMR. Outcomes in iLBBBCMR+ were poor. Survival in iLBBBCMR- was comparable to the general population.

 

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup