Trending Topic

3 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

It is with pride and gratitude that we reflect on the remarkable 10-year journey of European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. With the vital contributions of all of our esteemed authors, reviewers and editorial board members, the journal has served as a platform for groundbreaking research, clinical insights and news that have helped shape the […]

89/Benefits of support groups for patients living with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis

KH Sanders (Presenting Author) – Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge; PA Chousou – Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge; K Carver – Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge; PJ Pugh – Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge; H Degens – Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester; M Azzawi – Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Oct 9th 2012 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2022;8(Suppl. 1):abstr89
Select a Section…
1

Article

Background: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) experience anxiety, depression and reduced quality of life (QoL). Patient support groups are recommended in national guidelines for follow-up of patients with ICDs; however, although ICD recipients share experiences of patients with other long-term conditions, their risk of recurrent shocks is something unique to these patients and it remains to be seen whether support groups also have a beneficial impact on well-being in ICD patients.

Objectives: This systematic review evaluates whether ICD support groups have a beneficial effect on mental well-being.

Methods: Literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Eligible studies investigated patient-led support groups for ICD patients aged 18 years or older, using any quantitative or qualitative design. The Mixed-Methods Assessment Tool was used to assess quality. Quantitative results were grouped by outcomes indicative of ‘better mental health’ including measures of anxiety and QoL, and a meta-analysis was conducted. Thematic synthesis was used to generate analytic themes from the qualitative data. The data were integrated and presented using the Pillar Integration Process.

Results: Ten studies were included in this review. All studies bar one were non-randomised or had a qualitative design and patients had self-selected to attend a support group. Five contributed to the quantitative data synthesis and seven to the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis of anxiety and QoL measures showed no significant impact of support groups on mental well-being (Figure 1). Qualitative data showed that patients perceived benefit from attendance through sharing experiences and acceptance of life with an ICD, which encourages them to resume normal life activities.

Conclusion: This first systematic review and meta-analysis showed that while there is currently no quantitative evidence that ICD support groups have a significant beneficial effect on mental well-being, qualitative data show that patient support groups are perceived as beneficial by attendees. This suggests that we need other quantitative measures to assess the benefits of support groups for mental well-being. Attendees value the opportunity to share their experiences, which helps them to accept their new life with an ICD. Further research is recommended into the optimal format of support groups, level of involvement of healthcare professionals, and whether primary and secondary prevention ICD patients have different supportive needs. 

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup