Trending Topic

6 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

The first-in-human implantation of a leadless pacing system occurred already more than 10 years ago.1 The first-generation ventricular leadless pacemaker could provide only asynchronous ventricular pacing (ventricular, ventricular, inhibited [VVI], or ventricular, ventricular, inhibited, rate response [VVIR]), limiting its indications to patients with atrial fibrillation and severe bradycardia, those precluded for implantation of a transvenous pacemaker […]

Yield of contemporary clinical strategies to detect patients with obstructive coronary artery disease

Pedro Rio, Ruben Ramos, Tiago Pereira-da-Silva, Carlos Barbosa, Duarte Cacela, António Fiarresga, Lídia de Sousa, Ana Abreu, Lino Patrício, Luís Bernardes, Rui Cruz Ferreira
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Aug 17th 2018 Heart International 2015;10(1):e12-e19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/heartint.5000224
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Purpose. Noninvasive ischemia testing (NIST) is recommended for most patients suspected to have stable coronary
artery disease (CAD) before invasive coronary angiography (ICA). We sought to assess the diagnostic predictive
ability of NIST over clinical risk profiling in a contemporary sample of patients undergoing the currently
recommended diagnostic triage strategy.
Methods. From 2006 to 2011, 2,600 consecutive patients without known CAD undergoing elective ICA in a single
tertiary-care center were retrospectively identified and the prevalence of obstructive CAD determined. To understand
the incremental value of frequently used clinical parameters in predicting obstructive CAD, receiver
operating characteristic curves were plotted for six sequential models starting with Framingham risk score and
then progressively adding multiple clinical factors and finally NIST results.
Results. At ICA 1,268 patients (48.8%) had obstructive CAD. The vast majority (85%) were classified in an intermediate
clinical pretest probability of CAD and NIST prior to ICA was used in 86% of the cohort. The most powerful
correlate of obstructive CAD was the presence of severe angina (odds ratio (OR) = 9.1; 95% confidence interval
(CI) 4.3-19.1). Accordingly, the incorporation of NIST in a sequential model had no significant effect on the predictive
ability over that achieved by clinical and symptomatic status model (C-statistic 0.754; 95% CI 0.732-0.776,
p = 0.28).
Conclusions. Less than half the patients with suspect stable obstructive CAD referred to a tertiary-level center for
elective ICA had the diagnosis confirmed. In this clinical setting, the results of NIST may not have the power to
change the discriminative ability over clinical judgment alone.

Keywords

Angiography, Coronary disease, Diagnosis

2

Article Information

Disclosure

Financial support: No grants or funding have been received for this
study.

Correspondence

Pedro Rio Santa Marta Hospital Rua de Santa Marta 1169-024, Lisbon, Portugal pedrosantosrio@gmail.com

3

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup