This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

31 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is characterized by rapid (>300 beats a per minute), irregular electrical activation with variable electrocardiographic waveforms that prevents coordinated myocardial contraction, resulting in immediate loss of cardiac output.1 It most commonly occurs in the context of coronary artery disease.2,3 Resuscitation efforts are critically time-dependent: with each minute of untreated VF, the survival rate declines […]

46/Predictors and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) versus CRT upgrade in a real-world tertiary centre

C Sohrabi (Presenting Author) - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; N Papageorgiou - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; JSC Del Mundo - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; N Aziminia - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; M Finlay - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; A Creta - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; PD Lambiase - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; S Ahsan - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; P Moore - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; M Dhinoja - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; S Sporton - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; MJ Earley - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; RJ Schilling - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; C Hayward - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; R Providência - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; R Hunter - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; AW Chow - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; A Muthumala - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London
2 mins
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Oct 3rd 2011 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2021;7(Suppl. 1):abstr46
Select a Section…
1

Article

Introduction: The role of pre-implant and intra-procedural parameters on mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) in patients undergoing implantation with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) or defibrillator (CRT-D) versus CRT upgrade is poorly defined. In the present study we aimed to evaluate mortality predictors and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CRT-P/D versus CRT upgrade.

Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study of nine-hundred and thirty-three (933) patients receiving de novo implantation of CRT-P/D or CRT upgrade between 2016-2020: CRT-P (n=264), CRT-D (n=448), and CRT upgrade (n=221). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.9 ± 12.8 and median follow-up was 29.0 (17-41) months.

Results: We found that recipients of CRT-D were significantly younger (68.0 ± 11.9) than CRT-P (76.2 ± 10.8) and upgrade (71.8 ± 14.0; p<0.001) and had a higher uptake of oral anticoagulants (p=0.001) and aldosterone antagonists (p<0.001). CRT-P recipients were more likely to have baseline atrial fibrillation (AF; p<0.001). Overall mortality was significantly higher in upgrade (14.1%) and CRT-P (12.9%) patients versus those receiving CRT-D (8.7%) (p=0.039). On multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia predicted both mortality (OR: 3.5 [2.1-5.9; 95% CI] p<0.001, and OR: 1.8 [1.1-3.2; 95% CI] p=0.024, respectively) and HHF (OR: 3.8 [1.6-9.2; 95% CI] p=0.003, and OR: 2.9 [1.3-6.6, 95% CI] p=0.012, respectively). In addition, the presence of diabetes mellitus predicted HHF (OR: 2.2 [1.0-4.7; 95% CI] p=0.047), while AF was associated with a higher likelihood of mortality as compared to patients in sinus rhythm (13.6% vs. 10.1%; p=0.045). In patients with CRT-D, use of a bipolar lead was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality (16.7% vs. 10.7%; p=0.024) and HHF (8.0% vs. 4.0%; p=0.011) compared with use of a multipolar lead.

Conclusion: Our results showed that mortality is higher in patients receiving CRT upgrade or CRT-P as compared to CRT-D recipients. In addition, CKD, anaemia, diabetes mellitus, and presence of AF are associated with either higher mortality or HHF or both. The use of bipolar leads in patients with CRT-D was associated with poorer clinical outcomes compared to use of multipolar leads.

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup