This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

16 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for global cardiovascular disease, responsible for an estimated 10.8 million deaths and more than 200 million disability-adjusted life years annually.1 Despite the availability of effective pharmacological and lifestyle interventions, prevalence continues to rise, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over three-quarters of all cases now occur.2 The condition’s […]

46/Predictors and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) versus CRT upgrade in a real-world tertiary centre

C Sohrabi (Presenting Author) - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; N Papageorgiou - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; JSC Del Mundo - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; N Aziminia - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; M Finlay - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; A Creta - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; PD Lambiase - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; S Ahsan - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; P Moore - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; M Dhinoja - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; S Sporton - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; MJ Earley - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; RJ Schilling - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; C Hayward - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; R Providência - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; R Hunter - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; AW Chow - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London; A Muthumala - Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London
2 mins
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Oct 3rd 2011 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2021;7(Suppl. 1):abstr46
Select a Section…
1

Article

Introduction: The role of pre-implant and intra-procedural parameters on mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) in patients undergoing implantation with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) or defibrillator (CRT-D) versus CRT upgrade is poorly defined. In the present study we aimed to evaluate mortality predictors and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CRT-P/D versus CRT upgrade.

Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study of nine-hundred and thirty-three (933) patients receiving de novo implantation of CRT-P/D or CRT upgrade between 2016-2020: CRT-P (n=264), CRT-D (n=448), and CRT upgrade (n=221). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.9 ± 12.8 and median follow-up was 29.0 (17-41) months.

Results: We found that recipients of CRT-D were significantly younger (68.0 ± 11.9) than CRT-P (76.2 ± 10.8) and upgrade (71.8 ± 14.0; p<0.001) and had a higher uptake of oral anticoagulants (p=0.001) and aldosterone antagonists (p<0.001). CRT-P recipients were more likely to have baseline atrial fibrillation (AF; p<0.001). Overall mortality was significantly higher in upgrade (14.1%) and CRT-P (12.9%) patients versus those receiving CRT-D (8.7%) (p=0.039). On multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia predicted both mortality (OR: 3.5 [2.1-5.9; 95% CI] p<0.001, and OR: 1.8 [1.1-3.2; 95% CI] p=0.024, respectively) and HHF (OR: 3.8 [1.6-9.2; 95% CI] p=0.003, and OR: 2.9 [1.3-6.6, 95% CI] p=0.012, respectively). In addition, the presence of diabetes mellitus predicted HHF (OR: 2.2 [1.0-4.7; 95% CI] p=0.047), while AF was associated with a higher likelihood of mortality as compared to patients in sinus rhythm (13.6% vs. 10.1%; p=0.045). In patients with CRT-D, use of a bipolar lead was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality (16.7% vs. 10.7%; p=0.024) and HHF (8.0% vs. 4.0%; p=0.011) compared with use of a multipolar lead.

Conclusion: Our results showed that mortality is higher in patients receiving CRT upgrade or CRT-P as compared to CRT-D recipients. In addition, CKD, anaemia, diabetes mellitus, and presence of AF are associated with either higher mortality or HHF or both. The use of bipolar leads in patients with CRT-D was associated with poorer clinical outcomes compared to use of multipolar leads.

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup