This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

16 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for global cardiovascular disease, responsible for an estimated 10.8 million deaths and more than 200 million disability-adjusted life years annually.1 Despite the availability of effective pharmacological and lifestyle interventions, prevalence continues to rise, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over three-quarters of all cases now occur.2 The condition’s […]

61/Iatrogenic cardiac perforation following pacemaker and defibrillator implantation; presentation, management and outcomes

Peter Waddingham (Presenting Author) - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; A Creta - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; ASC Dennis - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; MJ Earley - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; P Moore - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; A Muthumala - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; AWC Chow - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London
< 1 min
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Sep 27th 2010 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2020;6(Suppl. 1):abstr61
Select a Section…
1

Article

Aims: Cardiac perforations caused by pacemaker and implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads are serious events. Due in part to their infrequency, management options and outcomes are unclear.

Methods: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary centre to identify patients in whom cardiac perforation occurred due to lead implantation or intervention. The search included all lead procedures spanning 3 years from 2016-2019. 6 months follow-up was assessed in all patients with perforation.

Results: Of 4619 procedures 32 patients were diagnosed with lead related cardiac perforation (involving 33 leads), mean age 74±15 years, 20 (63%) female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 51% (±11). 9 devices were implanted at other centres; therefore, the institutional rate of perforation was 0.5% (n=23 patients, 24 leads). 9 (39%) were identified acutely (<24 hours), median time to diagnosis was 32 (±49) days in sub-acute/chronic perforation. All but one leads were active fixation models; 25/32 (78%) had abnormal electrical parameters at device interrogation. 6/33 (18%) were ICD leads. 27/33 (82%) leads perforated the right ventricle (RV) in the apex or anterior apical region, 3 (9%) mid anterior RV and 2 (6%) lateral right atrium. Management was trans-venous in 31/32 (97%) patients with lead extraction or repositioning; pericardial drainage was required in 10/32 (31%), sternotomy with surgical repair was required in 1 (3%). 1 (3%) patient was deceased within 30 days, all other patients made a full recovery and were well at 6 months follow-up.

Conclusion: Although infrequent (0.5%), perforation occurred predominantly in the RV apex. No clear patient factors were identified as risk factors. Trans-venous lead extraction was safe and effective with surgical intervention rarely required.

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup