This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

31 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is characterized by rapid (>300 beats a per minute), irregular electrical activation with variable electrocardiographic waveforms that prevents coordinated myocardial contraction, resulting in immediate loss of cardiac output.1 It most commonly occurs in the context of coronary artery disease.2,3 Resuscitation efforts are critically time-dependent: with each minute of untreated VF, the survival rate declines […]

80/Conduction block and the impact of multipoint pacing with fusion optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy, an electrocardiographic imaging mapping insight

Peter Waddingham (Presenting Author) - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; M Orini - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; J Mangual - Abbott, Sylmar; A Muthumala - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; S Sporton - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; PD Lambiase - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; AWC Chow - St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London
< 1 min
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Sep 27th 2010 European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2020;6(Suppl. 1):abstr80
Select a Section…
1

Article

Background: MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) CRT may improve electrical resynchronization of the left ventricle (LV). Optimization with SyncAV dynamically combines intrinsic atrioventricular (AV) conduction
and pacing.

Objective: To assess regions of fixed and functional conduction block in patients with LBBB and the impact of MPP & SyncAV, evaluated by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

Methods: Patients in sinus rhythm with LBBB, having CRT implantation (MPP CRT, quadripolar LV lead) underwent ECGi mapping; during intrinsic rhythm, nominal AV delay and optimized SyncAV (offset minimizing QRS duration) during biventricular (BiV), MultiPoint pacing (MPP) and LV only MPP (LVMPP). Activation times (AT) were calculated. Sites with conduction block were defined as difference in AT >50ms over 10mm.

Results: ECGi was completed in 10 patients (80% male, mean age 66±16 years, 60% ischemic, LVEF 30±6%, QRSd 167±15ms). Latest activating LV segments during intrinsic rhythm were heterogenous: basal-anterior 20%, anterolateral 30%, lateral 10%, inferolateral 30%, inferior 10%. LV lead positions were concordant to the latest activating segment in 50%; adjacent 20% and remote (≥2 LV segments) 30%. Two or more lines of block of varying distribution were present in all cases. Leads were concordant with lines of block in 0%, adjacent 60% and remote 40%. Area of block was reduced by LVMPP SyncAV from intrinsic (p<0.05). MPP was superior to BiV by resolving (functional) block in 50% of cases

Conclusion: Patterns of conduction block and latest activating segment were heterogenous. MPP vs BiV SyncAV reduced functional block in 50% of cases. Evaluation with ECGi mapping may be of value for complex
CRT programming.

2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup