Diagnosis and management of coronary
artery disease represents major challenges to
our health care system, affecting millions of
patients each year. Until recently, the diagnosis
of coronary artery disease was possible
only through cardiac catheterization and invasive
coronary angiography. To avoid the risks
of an invasive procedure, stress testing is
often employed for an initial assessment of
patients with suspected coronary artery disease,
serving as a gatekeeper for cardiac
catheterization. With the emergence of noninvasive
coronary angiography, the question
arises if such a strategy is still sensible, particularly,
in view of only a modest agreement
between stress testing results and the presence
of coronary artery disease established by
cardiac catheterization. Much data in support
of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic
value of non-invasive coronary angiography by
computed tomography have emerged within
the last few years. These data challenge the
role of stress testing as the initial imaging
modality in patients with suspected coronary
artery disease. This article reviews the clinical
utility, limitations, as well as the hazards of
stress testing compared with non-invasive
coronary artery imaging by computed tomography.
Finally, the implications of this review
are discussed in relation to clinical practice.
CT angiography, stress testing, cardiac CT, coronary artery disease.
Armin Arbab-Zadeh, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St/Blalock 524, Baltimore, MD 21287-0409, USA. Tel. +1.410.502.0549 – Fax: +1.443.287.6624. E-mail: arminzadeh@jhu.edu
2011-12-21T00:00:00

Trending Topic
Cardiovascular medicine continues to advance at a remarkable pace, driven by innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration and an ever-deepening understanding of disease mechanisms. As patient populations age and chronic conditions become increasingly complex, the field stands at the intersection of precision therapy, digital health and preventive strategy. This winter issue of Heart International reflects that transformation, highlighting […]
Cardiovascular medicine continues to advance at a remarkable pace, driven by innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration and an ever-deepening understanding of disease mechanisms. As patient populations age and chronic conditions become increasingly complex, the field stands at the intersection of precision therapy, ...
Heart failure (HF) is a complex and progressive clinical syndrome that significantly impacts morbidity, mortality and quality of life (QoL).1 On a global scale, HF has become an escalating public health concern, affecting more than 64 million individuals in 2017, and this ...
Heart failure (HF) is a global health burden, with a 2019 prevalence of 711.90 per 100,000 population, totalling 56.19 million cases and 5.05 million years lived with disability, despite only modest declines since 1990.1Â Recent years have shown an uptick in prevalence, driven by ageing populations ...
Functional status refers to an individual’s ability to carry out different levels of activities to meet the needs of daily living.1 Patients with heart failure (HF) commonly have poor functional status that is affected by a number of physical, ...
Heart failure (HF), a prevalent disease, is the common final pathway of several conditions, which result in the activation of numerous neurohumoral pathways. Cardiorenal interaction plays an essential role in the progression of the disease, and the use of diuretics ...
Palliative care (PC) is recommended as a standard of practice for all patients with heart failure (HF) and is supported by evidence of improved patient outcomes (e.g. reduction in symptoms refractory to cardiovascular therapies and improved shared decision-making).1Â PC ...
Heart failure (HF) is a common clinical diagnosis often requiring hospitalization secondary to patient decompensation associated with clinically determined 'dry' or 'wet' volume states. However, fluid overload is the more common basis for clinical deterioration accounting for the majority of ...
Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome caused by a variety of cardiac and non-cardiac diseases, and is associated with high mortality and hospitalization rates.1Â Treatment has been traditionally based on a detailed history and physical examination. However, since cardiac ...
Conventionally, according to the European Society of Cardiology pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) guidelines, patients with clinical heart failure and an echocardiographically measured left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of <35% are considered for CRT implantation or standard right ventricular (...
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often co-exist. The incidence of AF is estimated to reach 45% of patients with HF and rises with the severity of HF symptoms, from about 5% of patients in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) ...
Heart failure (HF) is an increasingly prevalent clinical syndrome resulting from a variety of disease processes impeding the heart’s ability to effectively circulate blood. With advances in care and a steadily growing and aging population, HF management is becoming ...
Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent and morbid disease in the USA, imposing a significant burden on patients, hospitals and the health system. The prevalence of HF continues to increase, with over 650,000 new HF cases diagnosed annually.1Â There are ...
Keep track of your clinical interests and newsletter subscriptions.
Register for free to hear about the latest expert-led education, peer-reviewed articles, conference highlights, and innovative CME activities.
Or use a Social Account.
Already registered? Login below.